SOAS University of London

SOAS University of London

Diaspora Studies Undergraduate Degrees (27 results)

  • Student rating
    This is the overall rating calculated by averaging all live reviews for this uni on Whatuni.
    (4.0) 707 reviews
  • Overview Big City / Campus

Considering attending SOAS University of London? Check out their open days to see the campus for yourself and find out what their own students say about the place in these reviews...

SORT BY:

Filter by:

Modules

Study level

Study mode

Social Anthropology and Africa and Black Diaspora - BA (Hons)

Interdepartmental

3 years full time

TL50 UCAS code
Entry requirements 128-147UCAS Tariff Points
Show Modules (YEAR 1)

Politics and Africa and Black Diaspora - BA (Hons)

Interdepartmental

3 years full time / 4 years full time

TL53 UCAS code
Entry requirements 128-147UCAS Tariff Points
Show Modules (YEAR 1)

International Relations and Africa and Black Diaspora - BA (Hons)

Interdepartmental

3 years full time / 4 years full time

LT27 UCAS code
Entry requirements 128-147UCAS Tariff Points
Show Modules (YEAR 1)

Economics and Africa and Black Diaspora - BA (Hons)

Interdepartmental

3 years full time / 4 years full time

TL02 UCAS code
Entry requirements 128-147UCAS Tariff Points
Show Modules (YEAR 1)

Languages and Cultures (Middle East, Africa, South and Southeast Asia) and Africa and Black Diaspora - BA (Hons)

Languages Cultures And Linguistics

3 years full time / 4 years full time

TQ52 UCAS code
Entry requirements 128-147UCAS Tariff Points

Key Stats

Uni rankings and ratings

WUSCA overall rating
(3.94) 
WUSCA student ranking
92 / 279
CUG ranking
62nd

Student reviews

J
Jinoos
30 Oct 24

SOAS University of London

MA Migration and Diaspora Studies

OVERALL UNIVERSITY RATING
Tell us about your overall university experience so far.

Toilets need improvement. Best is the support system

K
Karen
30 Oct 24

SOAS University of London

MA Migration and Diaspora Studies

OVERALL UNIVERSITY RATING
Tell us about your overall university experience so far.

Best aspects: teaching quality Worst aspects: not super organized in the beginning