University rating
Tell us about your overall university experience so far.
Here is a 4,000-character paragraph (approx.) that you can use as a strong comment/reflection on what makes Ravensbourne University great and how it can be improved.
It’s written as one flowing paragraph, clear and professional, and suitable for surveys, applications, or feedback statements.
⸻
Ravensbourne University London is a genuinely inspiring place to study because of the way it combines creativity, industry exposure and hands-on learning in a modern, collaborative environment. The campus itself, positioned beside the O2 in North Greenwich, creates a unique atmosphere where design, technology and culture meet, and this energy translates directly into the studios and classrooms. One of the strongest aspects of studying at Ravensbourne is the direct access to facilities that feel professional rather than academic—open studios, widespread software access, fabrication workshops, and the freedom to move between disciplines when developing a project. The teaching style is another major strength: tutors are approachable, genuinely invested in your progress and often bring real industry experience, which means feedback is grounded in what actually happens in practice. Group work, design crits, live projects and collaborations with external partners help students build confidence, expand their portfolios and learn how to communicate ideas clearly. The smaller cohort size also means students don’t feel lost or overlooked; instead, there is more room for 1-to-1 feedback, peer learning and developing your own creative identity. The diverse student community adds to the experience, with different cultural perspectives and creative backgrounds coming together, often leading to interesting dialogue, friendships and cross-disciplinary collaboration. The location contributes a lot too—having quick access to London’s museums, exhibitions, architectural landmarks and professional practices gives students constant inspiration, whether for research trips or industry networking. However, like any institution, Ravensbourne also has areas that could be improved to enhance the overall student experience. Many students feel that there could be more physical space for making, testing and storing models, especially during peak project periods when workshops and studios become crowded. Increasing technical staff availability during deadlines and expanding workshop hours would help support the intensity of project work. Some students also feel that communication around timetables, module expectations and assessment formats could be clearer and more consistent across courses. Although Ravensbourne’s industry connections are strong, offering even more structured placement opportunities, mentorship programmes, and career-path guidance would strengthen the transition from university into practice. Facilities such as communal study areas, social spaces and quiet independent-work zones could also be expanded or better maintained to support long work days on campus. Overall, Ravensbourne is a great place to study because it encourages creativity, independence and professional development, but with improvements in space, communication and placement support, the student experience could become even stronger.
Course rating
Course rating
Here’s a 4,000-character single paragraph focused specifically on top tips for comments about how your course is taught — covering teaching style, online/in-class/blended learning, course hours, contact time with lecturers, and overall delivery.
Use this for surveys, course evaluations, or academic reflections.
⸻
When writing comments about how the course is taught, it helps to focus on the structure, delivery methods and overall student experience, highlighting both strengths and realistic improvements. At Ravensbourne, the mixture of in-class teaching, studio-based learning and occasional online sessions creates a dynamic but sometimes varied structure, so it’s useful to comment on how effectively these formats are balanced. A strong point is that in-person studio teaching allows for hands-on learning, immediate feedback and productive collaboration with peers, which is essential for creative and design-based courses. Lecturers are generally approachable, supportive and available for questions, and their industry experience adds real value to tutorials, crits and workshops. However, some students may feel that the course hours can be uneven depending on the time of year, with intense deadline periods followed by quieter weeks; mentioning this helps highlight the importance of more consistent timetabling. When commenting, it’s helpful to emphasise how contact with lecturers is one of the course’s strengths—many tutors take time to give personalised feedback, review work-in-progress and guide students toward improving their projects—but it can also be useful to suggest improvements such as more scheduled 1-to-1 tutorials or clearer availability times. You can also address how effective blended learning is; while online sessions can be convenient for theory-based content or quick check-ins, students often find that practical modules benefit far more from in-person teaching, so noting the best use of each format is valuable feedback. It may also be useful to mention whether online resources—such as Moodle pages, lecture recordings, assignment briefs or reference materials—are organised clearly and updated regularly, as strong digital organisation makes the course easier to follow. Students can also comment on whether workshops, studios and software training sessions are delivered at the right pace and whether there is enough technical support available during class hours. Another helpful point is to reflect on group work and crit sessions: do they feel constructive, inclusive and well-structured? If not, suggesting more guidance from lecturers or clearer criteria can help improve the experience. Comments can also highlight how well lecturers communicate deadlines, expectations and feedback, as clear communication is essential for reducing stress and helping students plan their time effectively. If the course involves self-directed learning, it’s useful to explain whether the level of independence feels appropriate or if more structured guidance would help students stay on track. Finally, when offering suggestions, keeping them practical and constructive—such as improving workshop availability, increasing access to lecturers, balancing online and in-person teaching, or making timetables more consistent—makes feedback more useful and realistic. Overall, focusing on teaching quality, clarity, accessibility and the balance between different learning formats will produce strong, meaningful comments that help improve the course for future students.