Increase staff pay so there are less strikes. improve the older parts of the campus, e.g. Chesham Building. Also, more study spaces!

Best: Seminar and lecturers. The content they present is detailed and they are always available for help. Worst: Lack of actual lectures and there ONLY being seminars. Also, the weird exam changes and format

No

So here's my experience as a postgraduate student at KCL: The student support services were excellent, they've put in a lot of effort to support our academic skills (e.g academic writing support, workshops on various skills related to our field, etc.), employability skills (CV reviews, workshops on working in different sectors within our field, etc.), employment opportunities at the campus, and accommodation services. In addition to that, we had access to a lot of lectures and conferences that involved academic experts and people from different industries. As a postgraduate student, I didn't have much time left to get involved in the activities of any student societies. I don't think my peers had time as well. We normally had our lessons late so we couldn't participate in many of the activities of the student societies. For instance I couldn't take part in the football games because some of the games coincided with the classes. The only thing that could be improved was that the university didn't really have a campus feel to it, there's not really much the university could do about it being located in central London. If you are looking for a university with a campus feel—living in campus, activities all day long, etc. Then you might want to consider a different university. Overall, I'd say it was a great experience for me because it had everything I wanted and needed. I was a postgraduate student and knew I wasn't going to spend much time on extracurricular activities so the campus feel wasn't a main priority for me.

The lecturers well trained in teaching and had a wealth of experience in their field. All the lessons were planned very well and was very engaging. I wished if the course included more practical aspects when it comes to education policy and planning, the course content could have been enriched with the practical realities on the ground. The felt that the course was very theoretical and academic, leaning most towards an academic route.

No